So they should it was a disgrace
Carole Offline
Multi tasker
***

Posts: 72
Threads: 4
Joined: Aug 2008
Reputation: 0
#6
RE: So they should it was a disgrace
(23-10-2009, 04:52 PM)superted Wrote:
(23-10-2009, 10:54 AM)norstar Wrote: I agree as well, with the awarding of the rep to Andy Reynolds but would the extra allowance given to Andy allowed any other riders in the Junior or Lightweight classes to have got a rep? It was the same race and all should be treated the same!!
As to the TT or professional riders at the Manx, this will go on for ever but if any rider averaging over 100mph is discounted as far as reps are concerned, would this solve the problem!

Although Ryan is obviously quick the main difference was what he was riding, and it is that which has put off a large number of riders. Although completely modern it's closer to post classic, and now that 4 valve heads are allowed that is where it should be

There's no doubt the Paton is quick, but it is within current rules, just as the replica Manx Nortons and G50's are. Let,s not forget that Andy was also riding a Paton.
Having said that, I for one am delighted that he got his replica- great bloke and well deserved. Well done Andy!
Life's too short- live it to the max and enjoy yourselves
23-10-2009, 11:37 PM
Website Find Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 23-10-2009, 10:54 AM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Carole - 23-10-2009, 11:37 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by andyr - 27-10-2009, 05:24 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by andyr - 10-11-2009, 11:23 AM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by andyr - 13-11-2009, 07:36 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by andyr - 10-11-2009, 05:33 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by andyr - 12-11-2009, 05:34 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by larryd - 12-11-2009, 10:28 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Tomcat - 24-11-2009, 09:53 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Tomcat - 04-12-2009, 01:50 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Tomcat - 08-12-2009, 11:04 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Tomcat - 14-12-2009, 08:56 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Malcolm - 16-12-2009, 01:05 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Stella - 16-12-2009, 02:25 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Stella - 17-12-2009, 12:30 AM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by andyr - 17-12-2009, 09:06 AM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Stella - 16-12-2009, 05:12 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 18-12-2009, 01:19 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by larryd - 18-12-2009, 03:09 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 18-12-2009, 04:20 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Stella - 18-12-2009, 01:49 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Stella - 18-12-2009, 05:56 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 19-12-2009, 01:09 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Stella - 18-12-2009, 11:56 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Stella - 19-12-2009, 08:27 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 20-12-2009, 11:33 AM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 20-12-2009, 08:44 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 24-12-2009, 05:07 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by Tomcat - 05-01-2010, 09:38 PM
RE: So they should it was a disgrace - by norstar - 10-01-2010, 05:22 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)